The Call For Concrete Replacement Tulsa OK

By Paul Rogers


Human taste and preference differ from one person to the other. This is based on different dynamics, and that is what makes people unique. When it comes to construction, people build differently based on recourses available among other factors. The choice of building material is an issue that rotates between using concrete or other materials. The question of concrete replacement Tulsa OK revolves about the above factors. The dilemma has been discussed below.

This is a material that can be used to construct features with a variety of shapes. This is possible due to its original form where it is turned into different shapes as a sub-solid before drying and taking shape later as a hard object. This way, it becomes easy to design and implement the design into the actual project. This unique quality makes it exceptional from many substitute materials.

Its availability is another factor that prevails over most materials. The substitutes are available in most regions around the globe. Thus, it becomes relatively cheaper to build with the material due to accessibility as opposed to imported materials from other areas. Most buildings are made of concrete as it is available and affordable to many residents than other building materials such as glass.

Durability is another factor that this material offers. Structures build of the material in Tulsa OK last longer than those of its alternatives. This makes it preferable by many individuals as no one want to keep refurbishing their buildings now and then.

On the other hand, this material has got demerits. Mining of its constituent elements leads to release of harmful gases into the air. Dust particles also find their way in the air, and these make it difficult for people to breath. More unsafe gases and oxides are emitted which lower the quality of air in the regions that the industry is located.

On the same side of the coin, transportation of the materials involves the use of heavy trucks. These meander through the streets of Tulsa OK emitting burnt gases through their exhaust pipes. This too contributes to a number of harmful oxides that lead to the greenhouse effect. The trucks destroy the infrastructure raising the cost of maintenance by the government.

The scarcity of other materials renders most people to stick to this product. Researchers are trying to come up with alternative construction materials. This is aimed at meeting the demand of concrete use in the industry. Currently, they have not given a satisfying solution that would outweigh the utilization of the current materials. Further research may yield a better substitute that would play the role with less limitation.

Analyzing the above arguments, it can be concluded that the material has more economic benefits in the long run over other substances. Consequently, it has proven to have adverse effects on the environment due to air pollution. The latter can be solved by replacing its use with different substances. This would be expensive but environmental friendly. Therefore, merging the two points of view, we can insist on controlled production of cement, ballast, and sand where gases released in the air should be reacted to form harmless matter at the chimneys.




About the Author: